Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission if you sign up via this link. This doesn't affect our rating.
In This Article
Published June 19, 2026· Updated September 11, 2026· By Evan Kowalski· Fact-checked by Abril González
Roobet launched in 2019 and quickly became one of the most recognisable crypto casino brands. As of 2 August 2026, KYC is no longer discretionary: the deposit flow now gates every deposit behind a mandatory “Your Details” form — first name, last name, date of birth, country, and full address — before you can fund your account at all. Third-party trust data is more mixed than the brand recognition suggests, too — see Trust & Reputation below.
Games
7,000+ games including slots, live dealer tables, and Roobet Originals (Crash, Roulette, Dice). Full sportsbook with esports coverage — Counter-Strike and League of Legends sit as dedicated categories, alongside horse racing.
Payments
11 cryptocurrencies: BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, DOGE, SOL, USDC, BNB, XRP, TRX, SUI. Minimum deposit is $10 (confirmed for card; no separate crypto-specific figure is published, but it’s the best available baseline). Minimum withdrawal is also $10. Card deposits are usually instant, occasionally up to 1 hour; withdrawals typically processed within an hour. Regional fiat rails are also listed as payment partners — Skrill, AstroPay, Interac (Canada), Pix (Brazil), UPI (India via IMPS), and WebPayPlus — these convert to crypto in the background rather than crediting a fiat balance directly; withdrawals are crypto-only regardless of deposit method.
Mandatory deposit wagering (AML): every deposit — crypto or cash — must be wagered 100% (1x) before it can be withdrawn, tipped, or used on Instant Raffles. This applies platform-wide, independent of any bonus. Tips received must be wagered 30% before withdrawal. Only settled sportsbook bets count toward the requirement.
KYC Policy
The Terms of Service (§4.9) and separate KYC-AML-CFT Policy still describe risk-based due diligence with no fixed gate — but live testing (2 August 2026) found the actual deposit flow doesn’t match that written policy: a mandatory details form (first name, last name, date of birth, country, address) blocks depositing entirely, for every account, not on a risk basis. It’s basic PII collection, not a document/ID upload, but it’s an unavoidable step before your first deposit — a harder gate than the discretionary policy the written Terms describe.
Trust & Reputation
Casino Guru rates Roobet “Above average” (7.9) with a “Very good” complaints ratio for its size, but its Terms review found one clause it considers unfair — winnings can be confiscated for “low-risk play” — and flagged “Other factors” as Negative.
AskGamblers’ editorial score is notably lower still than it was — 3.7/10 as of September 2026, down from 4.6/10, against a 5.1/10 player rating — and reading the complaint text explains the gap: a heavy, repeated pattern of large withdrawals — $250,000, $115,000, $111,000, $97,000, $20,000, ₹226,000 among the documented cases — getting stuck for days under a vague “routine verification” with no ETA. The complaint volume has grown too (75 tracked complaints, up from 65), with fresh 2026 cases continuing the same shape (a €1,300 balance blocked since early September 2026, a $4,536 account under review with no reason given). Most older cases are eventually paid out, but only after extended delay and AskGamblers pressure.
Trustpilot compounds this: Roobet’s aggregate rating is unavailable there “due to a breach of our guidelines” — an institutional fake-review flag, not a one-off penalty specific to Roobet — and the same large-withdrawal-stuck-in-verification pattern shows up independently at scale (2,286 reviews, 26% 1-star). Some disputes there involve the casino producing a detailed, unilateral justification for permanently freezing funds (e.g. citing an “organized fraud ring” to justify confiscating both winnings and a player’s original deposit) rather than a blanket refusal — a more substantive process than some casinos in this audit, but the underlying pattern of verification stalling that intensifies around large withdrawals is consistent across all three sources, with fresh 2026 cases including a $3,800 withdrawal rejected days after a win and an address-verification process where the stated document requirements reportedly shifted between rejections.
None of this is a confirmed regulatory action, and most disputes do eventually resolve — but the size and repetition of the affected withdrawals is a real reason for caution with anything beyond a modest balance.
Pros & Cons
Pros:
- Established brand since 2019
- 7,000+ games
- Rakeback from your first wager (Instant/Daily/Weekly/Monthly tiers)
- Large rotating tournament and raffle pools
- Fast withdrawals for smaller amounts
Cons:
- Trustpilot rating unavailable due to a fake-review guidelines breach; AskGamblers shows a repeated pattern of large withdrawals ($97K–$250K) stuck in unexplained “routine verification” for days
- Casino Guru flags one unfair T&C clause (winnings confiscatable for “low-risk play”) and a separate “Negative” factors flag
- No traditional deposit-match welcome bonus
- KYC required before your very first deposit — no longer the discretionary policy previously reported (changed 2 August 2026)
- Rakeback Vault mechanic delays part of each payout over 3–14 days
- Geo-restricted in many countries
Our Rating
| Category | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bonuses | 7/10 | No welcome bonus; four-tier Rakeback from day one plus large rotating tournaments |
| KYC Policy | 6/10 | Required before your very first deposit (name, DOB, address) — not the discretionary policy previously reported |
| Payouts | 8/10 | Fast for smaller amounts; large withdrawals report frequent multi-day “verification” delays |
| Games | 8/10 | 7,000+ titles with strong Originals section |
| Trust & Reputation | 3/10 | Casino Guru is decent, but AskGamblers’ editorial score is notably below its own player rating and Trustpilot’s rating is unavailable over a guidelines breach — both pointing to the same pattern of large withdrawals stuck in unexplained verification |
| Overall | 6.2/10 | Weighted: KYC 25% · Payouts 25% · Trust 25% · Games 15% · Bonuses 10% |
Verdict
Roobet remains a polished, well-known crypto casino with a strong game library — but its KYC is no longer discretionary (a mandatory details form now gates every deposit, changed 2 August 2026), and the brand recognition outpaces its current third-party trust record. Casino Guru is reasonably positive, but AskGamblers and Trustpilot both independently describe a real pattern: large withdrawals getting stuck in unexplained, multi-day “routine verification.” Most cases do resolve eventually, but plan around delays if you’re moving a serious balance, and don’t assume brand size alone guarantees smooth payouts.
Rating: 6.2/10
